{"id":14,"date":"2007-03-13T16:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-03-13T16:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.orcutt.net\/weblog\/?p=14"},"modified":"2013-12-18T01:28:43","modified_gmt":"2013-12-18T01:28:43","slug":"cutting","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/orcutt.net\/weblog\/cutting\/","title":{"rendered":"Cutting"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>No, I&#8217;m not referring to the sick practice of using razor blades on myself\u2014although there have been times when I&#8217;ve been tempted to. I&#8217;m talking about cutting words.<\/p>\n<p>A month ago, I received the most helpful rejection I&#8217;ve ever gotten from an agent. The agent, who shall remain nameless, said that while my novel was good\u2014well-written, great characters, entertaining story\u2014it was <em>over<\/em>written in many places, meaning over-described, over-rendered.<\/p>\n<p>Good advice is only helpful if the person to whom it&#8217;s directed is ready to hear it. Turns out, after so many no&#8217;s, I was ready. I looked at my manuscript with an absolutely ruthless eye. If the chapter, scene, sentence or word wasn&#8217;t fulfilling a purpose, it got its ass cut.<\/p>\n<p>Luckily I&#8217;m blessed with a brilliant wife who is a natural editor, and said wife just happens to be unemployed at the moment. Over the past month, Alexas and I would sit down each morning and read the book side-by-side. Each would make recommendations for cuts, and then we&#8217;d argue about it for the rest of the day. And then one of us would give in. Usually me.<\/p>\n<p>I went into this edit with an ideal in mind that I&#8217;ve termed The Fred Astaire rule. I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s apocryphal or not, but I once read that when shooting wrapped on one his films, Astaire would tell the editor, &#8220;Make it as good as you can, then cut ten minutes.&#8221; My plan was to cut the bit of excess verbiage lying around, then reduce the book further by 10 percent. I thought additional cuts would be impossible. I was wrong.<\/p>\n<p>In the end, I took a 93,000-word manuscript down to 74,999. Do the math and you&#8217;ll find that&#8217;s over 18,000 words, or almost 20 percent. The book now reads almost twice as fast, leading me to come up with the following formula:<\/p>\n<p><strong>Where<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>RS=Reading Speed percentage faster<br \/>\nOWC=Old Word Count<br \/>\nNWC=New Word Count<\/p>\n<p>RS=(((OWC-NWC)\/OWC)*100)*4<\/p>\n<p>The formula is BS, but the idea is simple. If you take the percent reduction and multiply it by 4, you&#8217;ll get an idea of how much faster the book reads. For example, if you take a 100,000-word book and cut it to 80,000 words (a 20% reduction), the book will then read approximately 80 percent faster.<\/p>\n<p>Along the way I kept an Excel file that tracked the cuts and gave me a running total. Geeky, yes, but it gave me empirical evidence of my daily progress. Besides, I like counting words. You can see a JPG of this file <a href=\"http:\/\/www.orcutt.net\/images\/ARPOW_Cuts.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Now you&#8217;re probably asking yourself, why is he telling us this? Who cares? What&#8217;s his point?<\/p>\n<p>My point, which I had to learn the hard way, is this: <em>Most of the time you can cut <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">more<\/span><\/em>. In the case of my book, I was able to cut so much that I&#8217;m now embarrassed I sent out the previous version.<\/p>\n<p>But I&#8217;m profoundly grateful to the agent who gave me true, constructive criticism. I feel as though I&#8217;ve turned a corner and that representation for this book is just over the horizon. At least Sweetie, my faithful cat, thinks so.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>No, I&#8217;m not referring to the sick practice of using razor blades on myself\u2014although there have been times when I&#8217;ve been tempted to. I&#8217;m talking about cutting words. A month ago, I received the most helpful rejection I&#8217;ve ever gotten from an agent. The agent, who shall remain nameless, said that while my novel was &#8230; <a title=\"Cutting\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/orcutt.net\/weblog\/cutting\/\" aria-label=\"Read more about Cutting\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,68],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-craft","category-rewriting"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/orcutt.net\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/orcutt.net\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/orcutt.net\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/orcutt.net\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/orcutt.net\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/orcutt.net\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5101,"href":"https:\/\/orcutt.net\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14\/revisions\/5101"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/orcutt.net\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/orcutt.net\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/orcutt.net\/weblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}