Spark Joy: In Which a Novelist Applies the Ideas of KonMari to His Entire Life

Inspired by my orga­niz­ing genius wife, I recent­ly watched the pro­gram Tidy­ing Up with Japan­ese orga­ni­za­tion guru Marie Kon­do. In the pro­gram and in her books (The Life-Chang­ing Mag­ic of Tidy­ing Up and Spark Joy), Kon­do explains the neces­si­ty of keep­ing in our lives only those objects that “spark joy” for us. If an object does not spark joy for us, Kon­do says, we need to thank it for its time with us and let it go. Kondo’s method­ol­o­gy is called Kon­Mari, and it’s not new. Orga­niz­ing experts like my wife have under­stood this idea for years.

Any­one who knows my wife knows that she is incred­i­bly orga­nized. Her work office per­pet­u­al­ly looks like she was just hired or fired. Since we’ve been mar­ried, although we’ve only ever lived in small apart­ments, my wife has been a mas­ter at elim­i­nat­ing clut­ter and devel­op­ing sys­tems to keep our things con­tained, acces­si­ble and effi­cient. It’s one of the many things about her I’ve come to real­ly admire.

This past week­end, my wife and I “Kon­Mari-ed” our entire apart­ment. Fol­low­ing Marie Kondo’s method­ol­o­gy, we began with cloth­ing, then our books (a library of 1,500+ vol­umes), then papers, then komono (basi­cal­ly every­thing else in the house), and final­ly sen­ti­men­tal items. When we were fin­ished, hav­ing only kept those items that spark joy for us and reor­ga­nized them, I felt a deep sense of calm and peace.

Besides watch­ing Marie Kondo’s TV pro­gram, I’ve been read­ing a Kon­do par­o­dy enti­tled The Life Chang­ing Mag­ic of Not Giv­ing a F*ck, as well as a book about the new Japan­ese Min­i­mal­ism enti­tled Good­bye, Things—in which the author argues for only hav­ing in your life those objects you absolute­ly need. Admit­ted­ly, this idea is a bit too extreme for me. Do I real­ly need my orig­i­nal Bar­ry Manilow and Bil­ly Joel LPs? No, but I enjoy them.

For now I’m stick­ing with Kondo’s “spark joy” prin­ci­ple and have decid­ed to apply the prin­ci­ple to all aspects of my life: not only phys­i­cal things, but also the peo­ple and rela­tion­ships in my life; busi­ness­es, insti­tu­tions, restau­rants and stores I inter­act with; and per­ceived oblig­a­tions from out­side enti­ties. I decid­ed that from now on, when­ev­er I’m con­sid­er­ing an inter­ac­tion, I’m going to ask myself, “Based on my pre­vi­ous expe­ri­ences, will this inter­ac­tion bring joy into my life, or will it only cre­ate a new expe­ri­ence of annoy­ance, frus­tra­tion, anger and/or sad­ness?”

Ten days ago, I had an oppor­tu­ni­ty to put the “spark joy” prin­ci­ple into action. I went to a Pough­keep­sie, NY post office with three box­es of inscribed copies of my books. In the past, I had always been able to get the Media Mail rate (less than ½ of the Pri­or­i­ty Mail rate) with­out an issue, because the box­es con­tained only books. The box­es I attempt­ed to ship on Fri­day also con­tained only books, and they were addressed to libraries. For these rea­sons, I thought my box­es would beyond reproach.

How­ev­er, despite hav­ing used Media Mail for dozens of ship­ments in the past, this time I was informed that my box­es had been flagged for pos­si­ble inspec­tion. Why? Because, the clerk said, peo­ple often tried to send non-media items with the Media Mail rate. I point­ed out to her that these box­es were addressed to libraries; what else could I pos­si­bly be ship­ping to libraries oth­er than books or media? When this didn’t con­vince her, I told her to open the box and inspect it right there in front of me. She told me she couldn’t, that only “some­one high­er up” was allowed to inspect the box­es.

So I left with my pack­ages, because I wasn’t will­ing to have some face­less enti­ty maybe open my box­es at some unde­ter­mined date and maybe approve them. I left, but not before giv­ing them a long-over­due, fes­ter­ing rant about how it’s pre­cise­ly this kind of non­sense that is inex­orably putting the USPS out of busi­ness. I stat­ed (emphat­i­cal­ly, but with­out shout­ing) that I have been a reg­u­lar USPS cus­tomer for over 20 years, spend­ing hun­dreds or thou­sands of dol­lars a year, but no more; from now on, I won’t be buy­ing so much as a stamp from them. I will nev­er again pay the USPS for any­thing. I added that the USPS los­ing loy­al cus­tomers like me is their death knell. For a long time they’ve oper­at­ed under the delu­sion that they’re the only game in town, but they’re not; “There’s this new thing out,” I said, glar­ing at the postal work­ers. “It’s called the Inter­net.” Final­ly, as I held the door open, let­ting the frigid Feb­ru­ary air gust in, I said to the two employ­ees behind the counter, “I hope you’re sav­ing for retire­ment, because I give the USPS five more years. In five years, you’ll either be out of busi­ness entire­ly, or the USPS will be a frac­tion of the busi­ness it once was.”

And by the glim­mer of fear­ful recog­ni­tion that shone in the postal work­ers’ eyes when they heard my pre­dic­tion, I know I’m right.

E.B. White, writ­ing in his barn office over­look­ing the Maine coast.

(By the way, if you think my pre­dic­tion of the USPS going out of busi­ness with­in five years is ridicu­lous, then you don’t know your his­to­ry. My mod­el for this pre­dic­tion is the his­to­ry of the rail­road in the US. After WWII, all rail service—passenger and freight—declined pre­cip­i­tous­ly because of the rise of faster, more con­ve­nient alter­na­tives: per­son­al auto­mo­biles, the US Inter­state sys­tem, and long-haul truck­ing. Well, the USPS is like the rail­road of yes­ter­year, and oth­er ship­ping com­pa­nies and the Inter­net are like those faster, more con­ve­nient alter­na­tives. Writ­ing in his 1960 essay “The Rail­road,” E.B. White unequiv­o­cal­ly describes the pre­cip­i­tous decline of the rail­road after the war and presages its even­tu­al near-extinc­tion. And with the speed of infor­ma­tion and change today, I con­tend that the decline of the USPS is going to be even more rapid; five years is sure­ly too long; it will prob­a­bly be utter­ly gone with­in three years.)

So we now come to the main idea of this blog entry—choosing things that “spark joy” over ones that make me want to bran­dish an axe. When I left the U.S. Postal “Ser­vice” that morn­ing, I took my pack­ages to Unit­ed Par­cel Ser­vice (UPS). Yes, I paid about twice what USPS would have charged me with their Media Mail rate, but the excel­lent, serene expe­ri­ence I had with UPS made the extra cost worth­while.

Instead of being grilled about the con­tents of my box­es or informed that my box­es might be inspect­ed by some name­less, face­less enti­ty; instead of get­ting back­talk from surly, pas­sive-aggres­sive employ­ees, I got the fol­low­ing from the UPS clerk: “Yes, sir. No, sir. Absolute­ly, sir. Here is your track­ing num­ber, sir. Thank you for your busi­ness, sir. Have a great day, sir!” Seri­ous­ly, the young man must have called me “sir” about eight times in two min­utes. It was a pleas­ant experience—the kind of expe­ri­ence I hadn’t had with the USPS in a very long time, if ever.

Apply­ing Marie Kondo’s “spark joy” prin­ci­ple to this sit­u­a­tion, it’s as if USPS was like an old sweater in my clos­et, a sweater which, per her rit­u­al, I took out, laid on my bed, and asked myself, “Should I keep this in my life? Does it spark joy for me?” The answer was, “Hell no.” The sweater was old and torn, had inex­plic­a­ble stains on it, and didn’t fit me any­more. In ret­ro­spect I see why I’d kept the sweater around: because I’d pur­chased it a long time ago—back when it was shiny and new and it did fit me. I had come to asso­ciate that old sweater with some ancient pos­i­tive expe­ri­ences I’d had wear­ing it, for­get­ting that since then all of my expe­ri­ences with it had been the sar­to­r­i­al equiv­a­lent of tar­ring and feath­er­ing.

In con­trast, when I took out my UPS sweater, I had a great expe­ri­ence. UPS tru­ly “sparked joy” for me, so I’m keep­ing that sweater and toss­ing the U.S. Postal “Ser­vice” one.

As I thought about this in the days fol­low­ing, I real­ized that I’ve been “Kon­Mari-ing” my life for 20 years with­out being con­scious­ly aware of it. Since 2002, when I quit my day job with Mer­rill Lynch, I have applied—often with­out con­scious thought—these ideas of elim­i­nat­ing clut­ter and dis­trac­tions in my work life. There is a long list of things I don’t do, peo­ple I don’t spend time with, activ­i­ties I no longer engage in, and “oblig­a­tions” I no longer hon­or.

For exam­ple, over the past two years I’ve dra­mat­i­cal­ly decreased my involve­ment with social media, to the point that I now only go on the inter­net once a week, and that only to check my email. I glance at my Face­book account even less—maybe every three weeks—just to make sure peo­ple haven’t died or tried to con­tact me with impor­tant oppor­tu­ni­ties.

Guess what? Invari­ably, they haven’t done either.

A part of me would love to pull out of social media and the online world alto­geth­er, but hav­ing totaled up the amount of time I’ve “invest­ed” in my online pres­ence, I know that over the course of a decade I put a work-year into that crap. To sim­ply delete all of my accounts would effec­tive­ly be throw­ing away a year of my life. I’m bet­ter off just leav­ing the pages and links and SEO junk out there like Old West store­front shin­gles, weath­er-beat­en and creak­ing in the dusty wind. At least then I might even­tu­al­ly gain some pos­i­tive return on my time invest­ment.

Return­ing to the Kon­Mari idea—keeping only the things that spark joy for me and dump­ing the stuff that makes me crazy—I am now apply­ing Kon­Mari to every­thing in my life. Imme­di­ate­ly after last Friday’s imbroglio with the USPS, I start­ed cre­at­ing lists of peo­ple, places, things, restau­rants, stores, etc. that give me joy, and lists of those that make me crazy.

The bot­tom line is, I’m get­ting rid of the stuff that makes me crazy, and keep­ing (and doing more with) those things that give me joy. Here’s anoth­er exam­ple: three months ago I rec­og­nized that alco­hol no longer brought me joy (if it ever did). While in a drunk­en stu­por, I punched some­thing or some­body (no idea; I blacked out), and I broke my hand (the 5th metacarpal neck; see pic­ture of X‑ray). When I woke up the next morn­ing, I knew the alco­hol was mak­ing me crazy and had to go.

I’ve quit drink­ing for very long peri­ods in the past (as long as 8 years), but there are two dif­fer­ences this time. One, I’m now in Alco­holics Anonymous—going to meet­ings and “work­ing the pro­gram.” Two, I’m apply­ing what I’ve learned about Kon­Mari to the prob­lem. Alco­hol equals no joy for me; there­fore, alco­hol is offi­cial­ly out of my life for­ev­er.

This week, I turn 49 years old. Even though health- and fit­ness-wise I rou­tine­ly pass for a guy ten years younger, the fact is, chrono­log­i­cal­ly I’m almost 50, which means that I have endured the exis­ten­tial, psy­chic weight of near­ly half a cen­tu­ry.

I am now offi­cial­ly “too old for this crap.”

While talk­ing on the phone with a high school friend the oth­er day, apro­pos of noth­ing he said, “We are run­ning out of time.” Anoth­er friend, over a year ago, told me how when he turned 50, he made the deci­sion not to spend time with peo­ple who don’t make him feel good.

Both of these ideas have been ring­ing in my head since my friends uttered them—especially the point about time:

I am run­ning out of time.

Time to become the best writer I’m capa­ble of becom­ing. Time to enjoy my life and those peo­ple most impor­tant to me.

Orcutt, July 2018. On his T‑shirt is his creed as a writer: “It is your object to con­vey every­thing to the read­er so that he remem­bers it not as a sto­ry he had read but as some­thing that hap­pened to him­self.” — Ernest Hem­ing­way

In terms of my writ­ing, I think if I con­tin­ue to keep myself in great phys­i­cal shape, I should be able to pro­duce excel­lent work for anoth­er 20–25 years. With this end­point in mind, how­ev­er, it’s imper­a­tive that I con­tin­ue to Kon­Mari my life.

If I only have anoth­er 20 years to become the best writer I can become, I’ll be damned if I’m going to will­ing­ly give a sec­ond of it to any­thing or any­body who doesn’t give me joy in return.

It’s tak­en me decades of focus and say­ing “no” to lots of things, but I’ve man­aged to hone my life to a razor’s edge. I’ve raised to an art form the elim­i­na­tion of dis­trac­tions and things that will pre­vent me from becom­ing the best writer I can become. Because I draw great inspiration—dare I say joy?—from a dis­ci­plined, rou­tine, Sisyphean life that would make most oth­er peo­ple want to put their head in an unlit gas oven and breathe deeply, I will con­tin­ue to do what­ev­er I must to pro­tect that life.

By Chris Orcutt

CHRIS ORCUTT is an American novelist and fiction writer with over 30 years' writing experience and more than a dozen books in his oeuvre. Since 2015, Chris been working exclusively on his magnum opus. Bodaciously True & Totally Awesome: The Legendary Adventures of Avery “Ace” Craig is a 9-episode novel about teens in the 1980s. It’s about ’80s teens, but for adults (in other words, it’s decidedly not YA literature), and he’s applied this epic storytelling approach to the least examined, most misunderstood, most marginalized narrative space in American literature: the lives and inner worlds of teenagers.

Comments (0)

Comments are closed.